Inventing Nadar
Félix Nadar took the first aerial photograph in 1858, so the story goes. The evidence, Emily Doucet notes, is mixed.
In Inventing Nadar, Doucet analyses the historical and material production of the nineteenth-century Parisian photographerâs famous and numerous photographic firsts. Focusing on these oft-labelled groundbreaking elements of his career, she deconstructs Nadarâs legacy as a prime protagonist in the history of photography by interrogating the media techniques used to construct his invention narratives.
Doucet highlights this highly mediated process as one that canonised novel applications of photography as discrete techniques with single authors and inventors. Looking to this process of mediation through the institutions and individuals that shaped Nadarâs archives, Doucet unpacks assumptions of Nadar as a master of early photography and shows how the medium is enmeshed in larger histories of media, science, and technology.
The result is both a new account of Nadarâs place in photographic history and a critical study of how stories of innovation take shape.
Original: $51.29
-65%$51.29
$17.95
Description
Félix Nadar took the first aerial photograph in 1858, so the story goes. The evidence, Emily Doucet notes, is mixed.
In Inventing Nadar, Doucet analyses the historical and material production of the nineteenth-century Parisian photographerâs famous and numerous photographic firsts. Focusing on these oft-labelled groundbreaking elements of his career, she deconstructs Nadarâs legacy as a prime protagonist in the history of photography by interrogating the media techniques used to construct his invention narratives.
Doucet highlights this highly mediated process as one that canonised novel applications of photography as discrete techniques with single authors and inventors. Looking to this process of mediation through the institutions and individuals that shaped Nadarâs archives, Doucet unpacks assumptions of Nadar as a master of early photography and shows how the medium is enmeshed in larger histories of media, science, and technology.
The result is both a new account of Nadarâs place in photographic history and a critical study of how stories of innovation take shape.












