Researching Incels
As the world wakes up to the incel problem following Netflixâs Adolescence, many examples of research into incels over the past decade have been poorly conducted. Researching Incels is a crucial intervention into problematic incel research â calling for a new framework for rigorous, responsible research to inform policy on the incel crisis.
A critical overview on poor research examples using the primary case study of a report commissioned by the UK Governmentâs Commission for Countering Extremism on predicting harm among involuntary celibates, the authors outline incel research that is methodologically flawed, unreliable, and normalises misogyny. Focusing primarily on two critical flaws of researching incelsâlimited conceptualisation leading to poor methodology; and positionalityâthey write from a feminist positioned critical analysis to offer a blueprint for the future of robust incel research in response to these limitations. This rebuttal is situated at the forefront of current polarising debates developing within the incel community, emphasising that incel research must address from a feminist perspective the underlying structural processes and ideologies that give authority and motivation to communities such as incels.
A âhow toâ guide for future research, Researching Incels also provides guidance for research, practice, and policy on how to approach and assess existing work, with explicit caution where research is characterised by the limitations outlined here. Breaking new ground as the first broad commentary on researching incels, this is an essential roadmap for âSeason Twoâ of incel research.
Description
As the world wakes up to the incel problem following Netflixâs Adolescence, many examples of research into incels over the past decade have been poorly conducted. Researching Incels is a crucial intervention into problematic incel research â calling for a new framework for rigorous, responsible research to inform policy on the incel crisis.
A critical overview on poor research examples using the primary case study of a report commissioned by the UK Governmentâs Commission for Countering Extremism on predicting harm among involuntary celibates, the authors outline incel research that is methodologically flawed, unreliable, and normalises misogyny. Focusing primarily on two critical flaws of researching incelsâlimited conceptualisation leading to poor methodology; and positionalityâthey write from a feminist positioned critical analysis to offer a blueprint for the future of robust incel research in response to these limitations. This rebuttal is situated at the forefront of current polarising debates developing within the incel community, emphasising that incel research must address from a feminist perspective the underlying structural processes and ideologies that give authority and motivation to communities such as incels.
A âhow toâ guide for future research, Researching Incels also provides guidance for research, practice, and policy on how to approach and assess existing work, with explicit caution where research is characterised by the limitations outlined here. Breaking new ground as the first broad commentary on researching incels, this is an essential roadmap for âSeason Twoâ of incel research.
